镜像自地址
https://github.com/binary-husky/gpt_academic.git
已同步 2025-12-06 14:36:48 +00:00
194 行
7.7 KiB
Python
194 行
7.7 KiB
Python
from typing import List, Dict, Any, Tuple
|
|
from .base_handler import BaseHandler
|
|
from crazy_functions.review_fns.query_analyzer import SearchCriteria
|
|
import asyncio
|
|
|
|
class 文献综述功能(BaseHandler):
|
|
"""文献综述处理器"""
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, arxiv, semantic, llm_kwargs=None):
|
|
super().__init__(arxiv, semantic, llm_kwargs)
|
|
|
|
async def handle(
|
|
self,
|
|
criteria: SearchCriteria,
|
|
chatbot: List[List[str]],
|
|
history: List[List[str]],
|
|
system_prompt: str,
|
|
llm_kwargs: Dict[str, Any],
|
|
plugin_kwargs: Dict[str, Any],
|
|
) -> str:
|
|
"""处理文献综述请求，返回最终的prompt"""
|
|
|
|
# 获取搜索参数
|
|
search_params = self._get_search_params(plugin_kwargs)
|
|
|
|
# 使用_search_all_sources替代原来的并行搜索
|
|
all_papers = await self._search_all_sources(criteria, search_params)
|
|
|
|
if not all_papers:
|
|
return self._generate_apology_prompt(criteria)
|
|
|
|
self.ranked_papers = self.paper_ranker.rank_papers(
|
|
query=criteria.original_query,
|
|
papers=all_papers,
|
|
search_criteria=criteria
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# 检查排序后的论文数量
|
|
if not self.ranked_papers:
|
|
return self._generate_apology_prompt(criteria)
|
|
|
|
# 检查是否包含PubMed论文
|
|
has_pubmed_papers = any(paper.url and 'pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov' in paper.url
|
|
for paper in self.ranked_papers)
|
|
|
|
if has_pubmed_papers:
|
|
return self._generate_medical_review_prompt(criteria)
|
|
else:
|
|
return self._generate_general_review_prompt(criteria)
|
|
|
|
def _generate_medical_review_prompt(self, criteria: SearchCriteria) -> str:
|
|
"""生成医学文献综述prompt"""
|
|
return f"""Current time: {self._get_current_time()}
|
|
|
|
Conduct a systematic medical literature review on {criteria.main_topic} based STRICTLY on the provided articles.
|
|
|
|
Available literature for review:
|
|
{self._format_papers(self.ranked_papers)}
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT: If the user query contains specific requirements for the review structure or format, those requirements take precedence over the following guidelines.
|
|
|
|
Please structure your medical review following these guidelines:
|
|
|
|
1. Research Overview
|
|
- Main research questions and objectives from the studies
|
|
- Types of studies included (clinical trials, observational studies, etc.)
|
|
- Study populations and settings
|
|
- Time period of the research
|
|
|
|
2. Key Findings
|
|
- Main outcomes and results reported in abstracts
|
|
- Primary endpoints and their measurements
|
|
- Statistical significance when reported
|
|
- Observed trends across studies
|
|
|
|
3. Methods Summary
|
|
- Study designs used
|
|
- Major interventions or treatments studied
|
|
- Key outcome measures
|
|
- Patient populations studied
|
|
|
|
4. Clinical Relevance
|
|
- Reported clinical implications
|
|
- Main conclusions from authors
|
|
- Reported benefits and risks
|
|
- Treatment responses when available
|
|
|
|
5. Research Status
|
|
- Current research focus areas
|
|
- Reported limitations
|
|
- Gaps identified in abstracts
|
|
- Authors' suggested future directions
|
|
|
|
CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS:
|
|
|
|
Citation Rules (MANDATORY):
|
|
- EVERY finding or statement MUST be supported by citations [N], where N is the number matching the paper in the provided literature list
|
|
- When reporting outcomes, ALWAYS cite the source studies using the exact paper numbers from the literature list
|
|
- For findings supported by multiple studies, use consecutive numbers as shown in the literature list [1,2,3]
|
|
- Use ONLY the papers provided in the available literature list above
|
|
- Citations must appear immediately after each statement
|
|
- Citation numbers MUST match the numbers assigned to papers in the literature list above (e.g., if a finding comes from the first paper in the list, cite it as [1])
|
|
- DO NOT change or reorder the citation numbers - they must exactly match the paper numbers in the literature list
|
|
|
|
Content Guidelines:
|
|
- Present only information available in the provided papers
|
|
- If certain information is not available, simply omit that aspect rather than explicitly stating its absence
|
|
- Focus on synthesizing and presenting available findings
|
|
- Maintain professional medical writing style
|
|
- Present limitations and gaps as research opportunities rather than missing information
|
|
|
|
Writing Style:
|
|
- Use precise medical terminology
|
|
- Maintain objective reporting
|
|
- Use consistent terminology throughout
|
|
- Present a cohesive narrative without referencing data limitations
|
|
|
|
Language requirement:
|
|
- If the query explicitly specifies a language, use that language
|
|
- Otherwise, match the language of the original user query
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
def _generate_general_review_prompt(self, criteria: SearchCriteria) -> str:
|
|
"""生成通用文献综述prompt"""
|
|
current_time = self._get_current_time()
|
|
final_prompt = f"""Current time: {current_time}
|
|
|
|
Conduct a comprehensive literature review on {criteria.main_topic} focusing on the following aspects:
|
|
{', '.join(criteria.sub_topics)}
|
|
|
|
Available literature for review:
|
|
{self._format_papers(self.ranked_papers)}
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT: If the user query contains specific requirements for the review structure or format, those requirements take precedence over the following guidelines.
|
|
|
|
Please structure your review following these guidelines:
|
|
|
|
1. Introduction and Research Background
|
|
- Current state and significance of the research field
|
|
- Key research problems and challenges
|
|
- Research development timeline and evolution
|
|
|
|
2. Research Directions and Classifications
|
|
- Major research directions and their relationships
|
|
- Different technical approaches and their characteristics
|
|
- Comparative analysis of various solutions
|
|
|
|
3. Core Technologies and Methods
|
|
- Key technological breakthroughs
|
|
- Advantages and limitations of different methods
|
|
- Technical challenges and solutions
|
|
|
|
4. Applications and Impact
|
|
- Real-world applications and use cases
|
|
- Industry influence and practical value
|
|
- Implementation challenges and solutions
|
|
|
|
5. Future Trends and Prospects
|
|
- Emerging research directions
|
|
- Unsolved problems and challenges
|
|
- Potential breakthrough points
|
|
|
|
CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS:
|
|
|
|
Citation Rules (MANDATORY):
|
|
- EVERY finding or statement MUST be supported by citations [N], where N is the number matching the paper in the provided literature list
|
|
- When reporting outcomes, ALWAYS cite the source studies using the exact paper numbers from the literature list
|
|
- For findings supported by multiple studies, use consecutive numbers as shown in the literature list [1,2,3]
|
|
- Use ONLY the papers provided in the available literature list above
|
|
- Citations must appear immediately after each statement
|
|
- Citation numbers MUST match the numbers assigned to papers in the literature list above (e.g., if a finding comes from the first paper in the list, cite it as [1])
|
|
- DO NOT change or reorder the citation numbers - they must exactly match the paper numbers in the literature list
|
|
|
|
Writing Style:
|
|
- Maintain academic and professional tone
|
|
- Focus on objective analysis with proper citations
|
|
- Ensure logical flow and clear structure
|
|
|
|
Content Requirements:
|
|
- Base ALL analysis STRICTLY on the provided papers with explicit citations
|
|
- When introducing any concept, method, or finding, immediately follow with [N]
|
|
- For each research direction or approach, cite the specific papers [N] that proposed or developed it
|
|
- When discussing limitations or challenges, cite the papers [N] that identified them
|
|
- DO NOT include information from sources outside the provided paper list
|
|
- DO NOT make unsupported claims or statements
|
|
|
|
Language requirement:
|
|
- If the query explicitly specifies a language, use that language
|
|
- Otherwise, match the language of the original user query
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
return final_prompt
|
|
|